↓ Skip to main content

A catalogue of putative unique transcripts from Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) based on 454 transcriptome sequencing of genetically diverse, drought stressed seedlings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A catalogue of putative unique transcripts from Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) based on 454 transcriptome sequencing of genetically diverse, drought stressed seedlings
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Müller, Ingo Ensminger, Karl J Schmid

Abstract

Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) extends over a wide range of contrasting environmental conditions, reflecting substantial local adaptation. For this reason, it is an interesting model species to study plant adaptation and the effects of global climate change such as increased temperatures and significant periods of drought on individual trees and the forest landscape in general. However, genomic data and tools for studying genetic variation in natural populations to understand the genetic and physiological mechanisms of adaptation are currently missing for Douglas-fir. This study represents a first step towards characterizing the Douglas-fir transcriptome based on 454 sequencing of twelve cDNA libraries. The libraries were constructed from needle and wood tissue of coastal and interior provenances subjected to drought stress experiments.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Norway 1 1%
France 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,869,919
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,596
of 7,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,345
of 260,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#259
of 627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.