You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preprints in times of COVID19: the time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00667-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raffaella Ravinetto, Céline Caillet, Muhammad H. Zaman, Jerome Amir Singh, Philippe J. Guerin, Aasim Ahmad, Carlos E. Durán, Amar Jesani, Ana Palmero, Laura Merson, Peter W. Horby, E. Bottieau, Tammy Hoffmann, Paul N. Newton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 17% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Peru | 3 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 68% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Librarian | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#450,700
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#23
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,745
of 441,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.