You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guidance for contact tracing of cases of Lassa fever, Ebola or Marburg haemorrhagic fever on an airplane: results of a European expert consultation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andreas Gilsdorf, Dilys Morgan, Katrin Leitmeyer |
Abstract |
Travel from countries where viral haemorrhagic fevers (VHF) are endemic has increased significantly over the past decades. In several reported VHF events on airplanes, passenger trace back was initiated but the scale of the trace back differed considerably. The absence of guidance documents to help the decision on necessity and scale of the trace back contributed to this variation.This article outlines the recommendations of an expert panel on Lassa fever, Ebola and Marburg haemorrhagic fever to the wider scientific community in order to advise the relevant stakeholders in the decision and scale of a possible passenger trace back. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Italy | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 25% |
Researcher | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 22% |
Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,864,827
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,907
of 14,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,377
of 275,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#143
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.