You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
MRI findings are often missed in the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neurology, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-12-153 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Carswell, Andrew Thompson, Ana Lukic, John Stevens, Peter Rudge, Simon Mead, John Collinge, Harpreet Hyare |
Abstract |
Establishing a confident clinical diagnosis before an advanced stage of illness can be difficult in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) but unlike common causes of dementia, prion diseases can often be diagnosed by identifying characteristic MRI signal changes. However, it is not known how often CJD-associated MRI changes are identified at the initial imaging report, whether the most sensitive sequences are used, and what impact MRI-diagnosis has on prompt referral to clinical trial-like studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Egypt | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 22% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 33% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,852,724
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#653
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,491
of 277,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.