↓ Skip to main content

Weighted pedigree-based statistics for testing the association of rare variants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weighted pedigree-based statistics for testing the association of rare variants
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin Yao Shugart, Yun Zhu, Wei Guo, Momiao Xiong

Abstract

With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, researchers are now generating a deluge of data on high dimensional genomic variations, whose analysis is likely to reveal rare variants involved in the complex etiology of disease. Standing in the way of such discoveries, however, is the fact that statistics for rare variants are currently designed for use with population-based data. In this paper, we introduce a pedigree-based statistic specifically designed to test for rare variants in family-based data. The additional power of pedigree-based statistics stems from the fact that while rare variants related to diseases or traits of interest occur only infrequently in populations, in families with multiple affected individuals, such variants are enriched. Note that while the proposed statistic can be applied with and without statistical weighting, our simulations show that its power increases when weighting (WSS and VT) are applied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 44%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Mathematics 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,140,433
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,742
of 10,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,636
of 276,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#185
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.