↓ Skip to main content

A new technique for mandibular osteotomy

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new technique for mandibular osteotomy
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1746-160x-3-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edela Puricelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 19%
Other 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,727,332
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#53
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,600
of 76,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them