↓ Skip to main content

A stakeholder-driven agenda for advancing the science and practice of scale-up and spread in health

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A stakeholder-driven agenda for advancing the science and practice of scale-up and spread in health
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wynne E. Norton, C. Joseph McCannon, Marie W. Schall, Brian S. Mittman

Abstract

Although significant advances have been made in implementation science, comparatively less attention has been paid to broader scale-up and spread of effective health programs at the regional, national, or international level. To address this gap in research, practice and policy attention, representatives from key stakeholder groups launched an initiative to identify gaps and stimulate additional interest and activity in scale-up and spread of effective health programs. We describe the background and motivation for this initiative and the content, process, and outcomes of two main phases comprising the core of the initiative: a state-of-the-art conference to develop recommendations for advancing scale-up and spread and a follow-up activity to operationalize and prioritize the recommendations. The conference was held in Washington, D.C. during July 2010 and attended by 100 representatives from research, practice, policy, public health, healthcare, and international health communities; the follow-up activity was conducted remotely the following year.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 29%
Social Sciences 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,542,233
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#721
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,375
of 278,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.