↓ Skip to main content

Preparedness of primary and secondary health facilities in India to address major noncommunicable diseases: results of a National Noncommunicable Disease Monitoring Survey (NNMS)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparedness of primary and secondary health facilities in India to address major noncommunicable diseases: results of a National Noncommunicable Disease Monitoring Survey (NNMS)
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12913-021-06530-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anand Krishnan, Prashant Mathur, Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan, Harshal Ramesh Salve, Sravya Leburu, Ritvik Amarchand, Baridalyne Nongkynrih, Himanshu Kumar Chaturvedi, P. Ganeshkumar, Vinay Urs K S, Avula Laxmaiah, Manjit Boruah, Sanjeev Kumar, Binod Kumar Patro, Pankaja Ravi Raghav, Prabu Rajkumar, P. Sankara Sarma, Rinku Sharma, Muralidhar Tambe, N. Arlappa, Tulika Goswami Mahanta, Pranab Jyoti Bhuyan, Rajnish P. Joshi, Abhijit P. Pakhare, Abhiruchi Galhotra, Dewesh Kumar, Binod Kumar Behera, Roshan K. Topno, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Neeti Rustagi, Atulkumar V. Trivedi, K. R. Thankappan, Sonia Gupta, Suneela Garg, Sangita Chandrakant Shelke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 4 3%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 69 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 71 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,378,070
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#974
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,599
of 422,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#24
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.