↓ Skip to main content

Early development of Ensatina eschscholtzii: an amphibian with a large, yolky egg

Overview of attention for article published in EvoDevo, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early development of Ensatina eschscholtzii: an amphibian with a large, yolky egg
Published in
EvoDevo, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/2041-9139-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Collazo, Ray Keller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Mexico 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Other 3 8%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from EvoDevo
#201
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,044
of 104,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EvoDevo
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.