↓ Skip to main content

Congenital Cataracts – Facial Dysmorphism – Neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congenital Cataracts – Facial Dysmorphism – Neuropathy
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-1-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luba Kalaydjieva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Psychology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,128
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,530
of 67,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.