↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-12-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenni Murray, Cheryl Leanne Craigs, Kate Mary Hill, Stephanie Honey, Allan House

Abstract

Healthy lifestyles are an important facet of cardiovascular risk management. Unfortunately many individuals fail to engage with lifestyle change programmes. There are many factors that patients report as influencing their decisions about initiating lifestyle change. This is challenging for health care professionals who may lack the skills and time to address a broad range of barriers to lifestyle behaviour. Guidance on which factors to focus on during lifestyle consultations may assist healthcare professionals to hone their skills and knowledge leading to more productive patient interactions with ultimately better uptake of lifestyle behaviour change support. The aim of our study was to clarify which influences reported by patients predict uptake and completion of formal lifestyle change programmes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 23%
Psychology 35 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,000,288
of 24,375,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#366
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,251
of 286,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,375,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.