↓ Skip to main content

The GoodHope Ehlers Danlos Syndrome Clinic: development and implementation of the first interdisciplinary program for multi-system issues in connective tissue disorders at the Toronto General Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 3,144)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
57 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The GoodHope Ehlers Danlos Syndrome Clinic: development and implementation of the first interdisciplinary program for multi-system issues in connective tissue disorders at the Toronto General Hospital
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13023-021-01962-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nimish Mittal, Daniel Santa Mina, Laura McGillis, Aliza Weinrib, P. Maxwell Slepian, Maxim Rachinsky, Stephanie Buryk-Iggers, Camille Laflamme, Laura Lopez-Hernandez, Laura Hussey, Joel Katz, Lianne McLean, Dmitry Rozenberg, Louis Liu, Yvonne Tse, Colleen Parker, Arnon Adler, George Charames, Robert Bleakney, Christian Veillette, Christopher J. Nielson, Sandra Tavares, Stephanie Varriano, Juan Guzman, Hanna Faghfoury, Hance Clarke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 20 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Materials Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 20 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#577,722
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#48
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,512
of 437,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#3
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.