You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Borsika A. Rabin, Peyton Purcell, Sana Naveed, Richard P. Moser, Michelle D. Henton, Enola K. Proctor, Ross C. Brownson, Russell E. Glasgow |
| Abstract |
The field of implementation science (IS) encompasses a broad range of constructs and uses measures from a variety of disciplines. However, there has been little standardization of measures or agreement on definitions of constructs across different studies, fields, authors, or research groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 25% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 31 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 18% |
| Psychology | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,629,676
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#599
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,073
of 278,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.