↓ Skip to main content

Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Borsika A. Rabin, Peyton Purcell, Sana Naveed, Richard P. Moser, Michelle D. Henton, Enola K. Proctor, Ross C. Brownson, Russell E. Glasgow

Abstract

The field of implementation science (IS) encompasses a broad range of constructs and uses measures from a variety of disciplines. However, there has been little standardization of measures or agreement on definitions of constructs across different studies, fields, authors, or research groups.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 36 26%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Psychology 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 27 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,131,907
of 11,874,992 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#382
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,953
of 302,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,874,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.