↓ Skip to main content

Cotinine versus questionnaire: early-life environmental tobacco smoke exposure and incident asthma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cotinine versus questionnaire: early-life environmental tobacco smoke exposure and incident asthma
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Carlsten, Helen Dimich-Ward, Anne DyBuncio, Allan B Becker, Moira Chan-Yeung

Abstract

The use of biomarkers has expanded considerably, as an alternative to questionnaire-based metrics of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); few studies have assessed the affect of such alternative metrics on diverse respiratory outcomes in children, and we aimed to do so.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,176,348
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,577
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,306
of 277,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.