You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Doing’ or ‘using’ intersectionality? Opportunities and challenges in incorporating intersectionality into knowledge translation theory and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-021-01509-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Kelly, Danielle Kasperavicius, Diane Duncan, Cole Etherington, Lora Giangregorio, Justin Presseau, Kathryn M. Sibley, Sharon Straus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 89 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,344,562
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#777
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,322
of 438,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#22
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.