You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Real-time numerical forecast of global epidemic spreading: case study of 2009 A/H1N1pdm
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-165 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michele Tizzoni, Paolo Bajardi, Chiara Poletto, José J Ramasco, Duygu Balcan, Bruno Gonçalves, Nicola Perra, Vittoria Colizza, Alessandro Vespignani |
Abstract |
Mathematical and computational models for infectious diseases are increasingly used to support public-health decisions; however, their reliability is currently under debate. Real-time forecasts of epidemic spread using data-driven models have been hindered by the technical challenges posed by parameter estimation and validation. Data gathered for the 2009 H1N1 influenza crisis represent an unprecedented opportunity to validate real-time model predictions and define the main success criteria for different approaches. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
Italy | 2 | 9% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
Scientists | 6 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 1% |
Italy | 3 | 1% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 25% |
Researcher | 38 | 17% |
Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Professor | 13 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 21% |
Unknown | 33 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 36 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 15% |
Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 9% |
Mathematics | 17 | 7% |
Other | 56 | 25% |
Unknown | 39 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,953,397
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,370
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,098
of 291,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#25
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.