You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-creation of practical “how-to guides” for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development—from theory to implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-021-00294-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Feldman, Paola Kruger, Laure Delbecque, Ashley Duenas, Oana Bernard-Poenaru, Séverine Wollenschneider, Nick Hicks, Janine Ann Reed, Ify Sargeant, Chi Pakarinen, Anne-Marie Hamoir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 27% |
| Australia | 4 | 11% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,405,323
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#113
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,383
of 434,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.