You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moritoki Egi, Hiroshi Ogura, Tomoaki Yatabe, Kazuaki Atagi, Shigeaki Inoue, Toshiaki Iba, Yasuyuki Kakihana, Tatsuya Kawasaki, Shigeki Kushimoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Joji Kotani, Nobuaki Shime, Takumi Taniguchi, Ryosuke Tsuruta, Kent Doi, Matsuyuki Doi, Taka-aki Nakada, Masaki Nakane, Seitaro Fujishima, Naoto Hosokawa, Yoshiki Masuda, Asako Matsushima, Naoyuki Matsuda, Kazuma Yamakawa, Yoshitaka Hara, Masaaki Sakuraya, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Yoshitaka Aoki, Mai Inada, Yutaka Umemura, Yusuke Kawai, Yutaka Kondo, Hiroki Saito, Shunsuke Taito, Chikashi Takeda, Takero Terayama, Hideo Tohira, Hideki Hashimoto, Kei Hayashida, Toru Hifumi, Tomoya Hirose, Tatsuma Fukuda, Tomoko Fujii, Shinya Miura, Hideto Yasuda, Toshikazu Abe, Kohkichi Andoh, Yuki Iida, Tadashi Ishihara, Kentaro Ide, Kenta Ito, Yusuke Ito, Yu Inata, Akemi Utsunomiya, Takeshi Unoki, Koji Endo, Akira Ouchi, Masayuki Ozaki, Satoshi Ono, Morihiro Katsura, Atsushi Kawaguchi, Yusuke Kawamura, Daisuke Kudo, Kenji Kubo, Kiyoyasu Kurahashi, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Shimoyama, Takeshi Suzuki, Shusuke Sekine, Motohiro Sekino, Nozomi Takahashi, Sei Takahashi, Hiroshi Takahashi, Takashi Tagami, Goro Tajima, Hiroomi Tatsumi, Masanori Tani, Asuka Tsuchiya, Yusuke Tsutsumi, Takaki Naito, Masaharu Nagae, Ichiro Nagasawa, Kensuke Nakamura, Tetsuro Nishimura, Shin Nunomiya, Yasuhiro Norisue, Satoru Hashimoto, Daisuke Hasegawa, Junji Hatakeyama, Naoki Hara, Naoki Higashibeppu, Nana Furushima, Hirotaka Furusono, Yujiro Matsuishi, Tasuku Matsuyama, Yusuke Minematsu, Ryoichi Miyashita, Yuji Miyatake, Megumi Moriyasu, Toru Yamada, Hiroyuki Yamada, Ryo Yamamoto, Takeshi Yoshida, Yuhei Yoshida, Jumpei Yoshimura, Ryuichi Yotsumoto, Hiroshi Yonekura, Takeshi Wada, Eizo Watanabe, Makoto Aoki, Hideki Asai, Takakuni Abe, Yutaka Igarashi, Naoya Iguchi, Masami Ishikawa, Go Ishimaru, Shutaro Isokawa, Ryuta Itakura, Hisashi Imahase, Haruki Imura, Takashi Irinoda, Kenji Uehara, Noritaka Ushio, Takeshi Umegaki, Yuko Egawa, Yuki Enomoto, Kohei Ota, Yoshifumi Ohchi, Takanori Ohno, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Kazuyuki Oka, Nobunaga Okada, Yohei Okada, Hiromu Okano, Jun Okamoto, Hiroshi Okuda, Takayuki Ogura, Yu Onodera, Yuhta Oyama, Motoshi Kainuma, Eisuke Kako, Masahiro Kashiura, Hiromi Kato, Akihiro Kanaya, Tadashi Kaneko, Keita Kanehata, Ken-ichi Kano, Hiroyuki Kawano, Kazuya Kikutani, Hitoshi Kikuchi, Takahiro Kido, Sho Kimura, Hiroyuki Koami, Daisuke Kobashi, Iwao Saiki, Masahito Sakai, Ayaka Sakamoto, Tetsuya Sato, Yasuhiro Shiga, Manabu Shimoto, Shinya Shimoyama, Tomohisa Shoko, Yoh Sugawara, Atsunori Sugita, Satoshi Suzuki, Yuji Suzuki, Tomohiro Suhara, Kenji Sonota, Shuhei Takauji, Kohei Takashima, Sho Takahashi, Yoko Takahashi, Jun Takeshita, Yuuki Tanaka, Akihito Tampo, Taichiro Tsunoyama, Kenichi Tetsuhara, Kentaro Tokunaga, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Kentaro Tomita, Naoki Tominaga, Mitsunobu Toyosaki, Yukitoshi Toyoda, Hiromichi Naito, Isao Nagata, Tadashi Nagato, Yoshimi Nakamura, Yuki Nakamori, Isao Nahara, Hiromu Naraba, Chihiro Narita, Norihiro Nishioka, Tomoya Nishimura, Kei Nishiyama, Tomohisa Nomura, Taiki Haga, Yoshihiro Hagiwara, Katsuhiko Hashimoto, Takeshi Hatachi, Toshiaki Hamasaki, Takuya Hayashi, Minoru Hayashi, Atsuki Hayamizu, Go Haraguchi, Yohei Hirano, Ryo Fujii, Motoki Fujita, Naoyuki Fujimura, Hiraku Funakoshi, Masahito Horiguchi, Jun Maki, Naohisa Masunaga, Yosuke Matsumura, Takuya Mayumi, Keisuke Minami, Yuya Miyazaki, Kazuyuki Miyamoto, Teppei Murata, Machi Yanai, Takao Yano, Kohei Yamada, Naoki Yamada, Tomonori Yamamoto, Shodai Yoshihiro, Hiroshi Tanaka, Osamu Nishida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 21% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 345 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 185 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 189 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,736,678
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#85
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,372
of 432,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.