You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biosecurity measures for backyard poultry in developing countries: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-6148-8-240 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Conan, Flavie Luce Goutard, San Sorn, Sirenda Vong |
| Abstract |
Poultry represents an important sector in animal production, with backyard flocks representing a huge majority, especially in the developing countries. In these countries, villagers raise poultry to meet household food demands and as additional sources of incomes. Backyard production methods imply low biosecurity measures and high risk of infectious diseases, such as Newcastle disease or zoonosis such as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI).We reviewed literature on biosecurity practices for prevention of infectious diseases, and published recommendations for backyard poultry and assessed evidence of their impact and feasibility, particularly in developing countries. Documents were sourced from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) website, and from Pubmed and Google databases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 12% |
| Researcher | 43 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 116 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 22% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 79 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 73 | 17% |
| Unknown | 122 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#756,890
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#33
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,394
of 286,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.