↓ Skip to main content

Integration of interactive, multi-scale network navigation approach with Cytoscape for functional genomics in the big data era

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of interactive, multi-scale network navigation approach with Cytoscape for functional genomics in the big data era
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-s7-s24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thanet Praneenararat, Toshihisa Takagi, Wataru Iwasaki

Abstract

The overwhelming amount of network data in functional genomics is making its visualization cluttered with jumbling nodes and edges. Such cluttered network visualization, which is known as "hair-balls", is significantly hindering data interpretation and analysis of researchers. Effective navigation approaches that can always abstract network data properly and present them insightfully are hence required, to help researchers interpret the data and acquire knowledge efficiently. Cytoscape is a de facto standard platform for network visualization and analysis, which has many users around the world. Apart from its core sophisticated features, it easily allows for extension of the functionalities by loading extra plug-ins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 45 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 37%
Computer Science 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,031,675
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,496
of 11,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,773
of 287,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#64
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.