You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reflective writing: a tool to support continuous learning and improved effectiveness in implementation facilitators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00203-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya T. Olmos-Ochoa, Karissa M. Fenwick, David A. Ganz, Neetu Chawla, Lauren S. Penney, Jenny M. Barnard, Isomi M. Miake-Lye, Alison B. Hamilton, Erin P. Finley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 40% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Scientists | 9 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,016,915
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#109
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,965
of 418,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.