↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of abnormal cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in recovered patients from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of abnormal cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in recovered patients from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12968-021-00792-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Young Kim, Kyunghwa Han, Young Joo Suh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Computer Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 25 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,748,912
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#57
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,602
of 434,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.