You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do major life events influence physical activity among older adults: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margot A Koeneman, Mai JM Chinapaw, Marieke W Verheijden, Theo G van Tilburg, Marjolein Visser, Dorly JH Deeg, Marijke Hopman-Rock |
Abstract |
Major life events are associated with a change in daily routine and could thus also affect habitual levels of physical activity. Major life events remain largely unexplored as determinants of older adults' participation in physical activity and sports. This study focused on two major life events, widowhood and retirement, and asked whether these major life events were associated with moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sports participation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Netherlands | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 14 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,174,641
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,451
of 1,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,987
of 261,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#66
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.