You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-021-06917-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Billings, Brian Chi Fung Ching, Vasiliki Gkofa, Talya Greene, Michael Bloomfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 43% |
| Scientists | 9 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 441 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 16% |
| Unknown | 206 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Psychology | 23 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Unknown | 219 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,239,221
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#350
of 8,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,974
of 434,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#8
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.