↓ Skip to main content

Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-12-146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Jull, Dawn Stacey, Audrey Giles, Yvonne Boyer

Abstract

Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women ("Aboriginal women"). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred care. The objective of this study is to explore Aboriginal women's health and social decision-making needs and to engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Librarian 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 19%
Social Sciences 18 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Computer Science 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 20 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,497,641
of 16,024,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#115
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,925
of 262,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#18
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,024,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.