↓ Skip to main content

Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-12-146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Jull, Dawn Stacey, Audrey Giles, Yvonne Boyer

Abstract

Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women ("Aboriginal women"). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred care. The objective of this study is to explore Aboriginal women's health and social decision-making needs and to engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Librarian 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Social Sciences 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,242,227
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#149
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,360
of 280,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.