↓ Skip to main content

Development, characteristics and impact of quality improvement casebooks: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development, characteristics and impact of quality improvement casebooks: a scoping review
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12961-021-00777-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie N. Anderson, Anna R. Gagliardi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Librarian 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 12 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Computer Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,155,790
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,072
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,620
of 429,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#30
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.