You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-604 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maximino Redondo, Rafael Funez, Francisco Medina-Cano, Isabel Rodrigo, Mercedes Acebal, Teresa Tellez, M Jose Roldan, M Luisa Hortas, Ana Bellinvia, Teresa Pereda, Laia Domingo, María Morales-Suarez Varela, Maria Sala, Antonio Rueda |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to measure the biological characteristics involved in tumorigenesis and the progression of breast cancer in symptomatic and screen-detected carcinomas to identify possible differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 29% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,677,179
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,131
of 8,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,178
of 261,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#46
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.