You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise therapy for bone and muscle health: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kåre Birger Hagen, Hanne Dagfinrud, Rikke Helene Moe, Nina Østerås, Ingvild Kjeken, Margreth Grotle, Geir Smedslund |
| Abstract |
Musculoskeletal conditions (MSCs) are widely prevalent in present-day society, with resultant high healthcare costs and substantial negative effects on patient health and quality of life. The main aim of this overview was to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of exercise therapy (ET) on pain and physical function for patients with MSCs. In addition, the evidence for the effect of ET on disease pathogenesis, and whether particular components of exercise programs are associated with the size of the treatment effects, was also explored. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 378 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 75 | 19% |
| Unknown | 97 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 120 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,245,812
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#872
of 4,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,273
of 289,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#16
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.