↓ Skip to main content

Metagenome of the gut of a malnourished child

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metagenome of the gut of a malnourished child
Published in
Gut Pathogens, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1757-4749-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sourav Sen Gupta, Monzoorul Haque Mohammed, Tarini Shankar Ghosh, Suman Kanungo, Gopinath Balakrish Nair, Sharmila S Mande

Abstract

Malnutrition, a major health problem, affects a significant proportion of preschool children in developing countries. The devastating consequences of malnutrition include diarrhoea, malabsorption, increased intestinal permeability, suboptimal immune response, etc. Nutritional interventions and dietary solutions have not been effective for treatment of malnutrition till date. Metagenomic procedures allow one to access the complex cross-talk between the gut and its microbial flora and understand how a different community composition affects various states of human health. In this study, a metagenomic approach was employed for analysing the differences between gut microbial communities obtained from a malnourished and an apparently healthy child.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 170 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 19%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,968,356
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#39
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,770
of 113,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them