↓ Skip to main content

Arachidonic acid and cancer risk: a systematic review of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arachidonic acid and cancer risk: a systematic review of observational studies
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mai Sakai, Saki Kakutani, Chika Horikawa, Hisanori Tokuda, Hiroshi Kawashima, Hiroshi Shibata, Hitomi Okubo, Satoshi Sasaki

Abstract

An n-6 essential fatty acid, arachidonic acid (ARA) is converted into prostaglandin E2, which is involved in tumour extension. However, it is unclear whether dietary ARA intake leads to cancer in humans. We thus systematically evaluated available observational studies on the relationship between ARA exposure and the risk of colorectal, skin, breast, prostate, lung, and stomach cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,866,358
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,710
of 8,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,556
of 280,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#41
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.