↓ Skip to main content

Sustaining modified behaviours learnt in a diabetes prevention program in regional Australia: the role of social context

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustaining modified behaviours learnt in a diabetes prevention program in regional Australia: the role of social context
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Walker, Andrea Hernan, Prasuna Reddy, James A Dunbar

Abstract

The Greater Green Triangle diabetes prevention program was conducted in primary health care setting of Victoria and South Australia in 2004-2006. This program demonstrated significant reductions in diabetes risk factors which were largely sustained at 18 month follow-up. The theoretical model utilised in this program achieved its outcomes through improvements in coping self-efficacy and planning. Previous evaluations have concentrated on the behavioural components of the intervention. Other variables external to the main research design may have contributed to the success factors but have yet to be identified. The objective of this evaluation was to identify the extent to which participants in a diabetes prevention program sustained lifestyle changes several years after completing the program and to identify contextual factors that contributed to sustaining changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Psychology 6 9%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,385,333
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,084
of 7,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,121
of 261,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.