↓ Skip to main content

Cultural adaptation of the Condom Use Self Efficacy Scale (CUSES) in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cultural adaptation of the Condom Use Self Efficacy Scale (CUSES) in Ghana
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwaku O Asante, Paul N Doku

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 23%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Psychology 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,091
of 15,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,821
of 96,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#41
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.