You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing the potential of a virtual reality neurorehabilitation system during performance of observation, imagery and imitation of motor actions recorded by wireless functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-7-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Holper, Thomas Muehlemann, Felix Scholkmann, Kynan Eng, Daniel Kiper, Martin Wolf |
| Abstract |
Several neurorehabilitation strategies have been introduced over the last decade based on the so-called simulation hypothesis. This hypothesis states that a neural network located in primary and secondary motor areas is activated not only during overt motor execution, but also during observation or imagery of the same motor action. Based on this hypothesis, we investigated the combination of a virtual reality (VR) based neurorehabilitation system together with a wireless functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) instrument. This combination is particularly appealing from a rehabilitation perspective as it may allow minimally constrained monitoring during neurorehabilitative training. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 22% |
| Researcher | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 17% |
| Engineering | 33 | 13% |
| Psychology | 32 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 32 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,489,392
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#477
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,688
of 183,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.