You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation of a central-line bundle: a qualitative study of three clinical units
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00204-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanne Goldman, Leahora Rotteau, Kaveh G. Shojania, G. Ross Baker, Paula Rowland, Marlys K. Christianson, Timothy J. Vogus, Connie Cameron, Maitreya Coffey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 9 | 32% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
United States | 4 | 14% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
Scientists | 6 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,807,381
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#43
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,559
of 421,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.