↓ Skip to main content

Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew P Black, Julie Brimblecombe, Helen Eyles, Peter Morris, Hassan Vally, Kerin O′Dea

Abstract

Less healthy diets are common in high income countries, although proportionally higher in those of low socio-economic status. Food subsidy programs are one strategy to promote healthy nutrition and to reduce socio-economic inequalities in health. This review summarises the evidence for the health and nutritional impacts of food subsidy programs among disadvantaged families from high income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 294 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 17%
Student > Bachelor 51 17%
Researcher 43 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Social Sciences 30 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 78 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,351,555
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,545
of 17,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,290
of 290,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.