↓ Skip to main content

Sagittal plane gait characteristics in hip osteoarthritis patients with mild to moderate symptoms compared to healthy controls: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sagittal plane gait characteristics in hip osteoarthritis patients with mild to moderate symptoms compared to healthy controls: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Eitzen, Linda Fernandes, Lars Nordsletten, May Arna Risberg

Abstract

Existent biomechanical studies on hip osteoarthritic gait have primarily focused on the end stage of disease. Consequently, there is no clear consensus on which specific gait parameters are of most relevance for hip osteoarthritis patients with mild to moderate symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore sagittal plane gait characteristics during the stance phase of gait in hip osteoarthritis patients not eligible for hip replacement surgery. First, compared to healthy controls, and second, when categorized into two subgroups of radiographic severity defined from a minimal joint space of ≤/>2 mm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 21%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 55 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 17%
Engineering 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 70 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#13,142,022
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,816
of 4,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,661
of 280,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#38
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.