You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrition and physical activity programs for obesity treatment (PRONAF study): methodological approach of the project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Augusto G Zapico, Pedro J Benito, Marcela González-Gross, Ana B Peinado, Esther Morencos, Blanca Romero, Miguel A Rojo-Tirado, Rocio Cupeiro, Barbara Szendrei, Javier Butragueño, Maite Bermejo, María Alvarez-Sánchez, Miguel García-Fuentes, Carmen Gómez-Candela, Laura M Bermejo, Ceila Fernandez-Fernandez, Francisco J Calderón |
| Abstract |
At present, scientific consensus exists on the multifactorial etiopatogenia of obesity. Both professionals and researchers agree that treatment must also have a multifactorial approach, including diet, physical activity, pharmacology and/or surgical treatment. These two last ones should be reserved for those cases of morbid obesities or in case of failure of the previous ones. The aim of the PRONAF study is to determine what type of exercise combined with caloric restriction is the most appropriate to be included in overweigth and obesity intervention programs, and the aim of this paper is to describe the design and the evaluation methods used to carry out the PRONAF study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 21% |
| Peru | 3 | 9% |
| Brazil | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 300 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 85 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 63 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 91 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,453,211
of 23,755,107 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,582
of 15,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,383
of 284,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,755,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.