You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complete root specimen of plants grown in soil-filled root box: sampling, measuring, and staining method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-021-00798-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takuya Koyama, Shun Murakami, Toshihiko Karasawa, Masato Ejiri, Katsuhiro Shiono |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Sudan | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,059,918
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#219
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,017
of 427,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.