You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vaccine hesitancy: evidence from an adverse events following immunization database, and the role of cognitive biases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11745-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hossein Azarpanah, Mohsen Farhadloo, Rustam Vahidov, Louise Pilote |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Japan | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 63 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#564,983
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#550
of 17,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,349
of 423,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#18
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.