↓ Skip to main content

Strand-specific RNA-seq reveals widespread occurrence of novel cis- natural antisense transcripts in rice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strand-specific RNA-seq reveals widespread occurrence of novel cis- natural antisense transcripts in rice
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-721
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tingting Lu, Chuanrang Zhu, Guojun Lu, Yunli Guo, Yan Zhou, Zhiyong Zhang, Yan Zhao, Wenjun Li, Ying Lu, Weihua Tang, Qi Feng, Bin Han

Abstract

Cis-natural antisense transcripts (cis-NATs) are RNAs transcribed from the antisense strand of a gene locus, and are complementary to the RNA transcribed from the sense strand. Common techniques including microarray approach and analysis of transcriptome databases are the major ways to globally identify cis-NATs in various eukaryotic organisms. Genome-wide in silico analysis has identified a large number of cis-NATs that may generate endogenous short interfering RNAs (nat-siRNAs), which participate in important biogenesis mechanisms for transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation in rice. However, the transcriptomes are yet to be deeply sequenced to comprehensively investigate cis-NATs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 130 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Researcher 33 24%
Student > Master 16 12%
Other 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 20%
Unspecified 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,678,548
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,297
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,940
of 288,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#22
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.