↓ Skip to main content

Motives for early retirement of self-employed GPs in the Netherlands: a comparison of two time periods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motives for early retirement of self-employed GPs in the Netherlands: a comparison of two time periods
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malou Van Greuningen, Phil JM Heiligers, Lud FJ Van der Velden

Abstract

The high cost of training and the relatively long period of training for physicians make it beneficial to stimulate physicians to retire later. Therefore, a better understanding of the link between the factors influencing the decision to retire and actual turnover would benefit policies designed to encourage later retirement. This study focuses on actual GP turnover and the determining factors for this in the Netherlands. The period 2003-2007 saw fewer GPs retiring from general practice than the period 1998-2002. In addition, GPs' retirement age was higher in 2003-2007. For these two periods, we analysed work perception, objective workload and reasons for leaving, and related these with the probability that GPs would leave general practice at an early age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 15%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,613,720
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,272
of 7,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,203
of 280,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#92
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.