You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill A Hayden, Jennifer L Cartwright, Richard D Riley, Maurits W vanTulder, the Chronic Low Back Pain IPD Meta-Analysis Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,918,838
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,250
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,357
of 280,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.