↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of a health-social partnership transitional program for post-discharge medical patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of a health-social partnership transitional program for post-discharge medical patients
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-479
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Kam Yuet Wong, June Chau, Ching So, Stanley Ku Fu Tam, Sarah McGhee

Abstract

Readmissions are costly and have implications for quality of care. Studies have been reported to support effects of transitional care programs in reducing hospital readmissions and enhancing clinical outcomes. However, there is a paucity of studies executing full economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of these transitional care programs. This study is therefore launched to fill this knowledge gap.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 11 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2012.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,433
of 7,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,993
of 280,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#113
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.