You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can the adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) checklist be utilized to predict emergency department visits among children and adolescents?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01392-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asmita Bhattarai, Gina Dimitropoulos, Brian Marriott, Jaime Paget, Andrew G. M. Bulloch, Suzanne C. Tough, Scott B. Patten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,290,666
of 24,315,442 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#668
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,639
of 423,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,315,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.