↓ Skip to main content

The encounter with God in myth and madness

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The encounter with God in myth and madness
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-2-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Otto Doerr, Óscar Velásquez

Abstract

It is well known how often psychiatric patients report religious experiences. These are especially frequent in schizophrenic and epileptic patients as the subject of their delusions. The question we pose is: are there differences between this kind of religious experiences and those we find in religious texts or in the mythological tradition?

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Philosophy 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#155
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,816
of 78,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.