You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of the first phase of COVID-19 pandemic on childhood routine immunisation services in Nepal: a qualitative study on the perspectives of service providers and users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-021-00366-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asmita Priyadarshini Khatiwada, Smriti Maskey, Nistha Shrestha, Sunil Shrestha, Saval Khanal, Bhuvan Kc, Vibhu Paudyal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Researcher | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 67 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,182,778
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#81
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,089
of 432,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.