You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A magneto-optical biochip for rapid assay based on the Cotton–Mouton effect of γ-Fe2O3@Au core/shell nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-01030-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kuen-Lin Chen, Zih-Yan Yang, Chin-Wei Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#815
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,119
of 433,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#58
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.