You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distinct B cell subsets in Peyer’s patches convey probiotic effects by Limosilactobacillus reuteri
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-021-01128-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hao-Yu Liu, Antoine Giraud, Cedric Seignez, David Ahl, Feilong Guo, John Sedin, Tomas Walden, Jee-Hwan Oh, Jan Peter van Pijkeren, Lena Holm, Stefan Roos, Stefan Bertilsson, Mia Phillipson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,278,146
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#410
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,441
of 439,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.