↓ Skip to main content

Improving sexual health for HIV patients by providing a combination of integrated public health and hospital care services; a one-group pre- and post test intervention comparison

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving sexual health for HIV patients by providing a combination of integrated public health and hospital care services; a one-group pre- and post test intervention comparison
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole HTM Dukers-Muijrers, Carlijn Somers, Christian JPA Hoebe, Selwyn H Lowe, Anne-Marie EJWM Niekamp, Astrid Oude Lashof, Cathrien AMVH Bruggeman, Hubertus JM Vrijhoef

Abstract

Hospital HIV care and public sexual health care (a Sexual Health Care Centre) services were integrated to provide sexual health counselling and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) testing and treatment (sexual health care) to larger numbers of HIV patients. Services, need and usage were assessed using a patient perspective, which is a key factor for the success of service integration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 30%
Social Sciences 13 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,037,004
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,943
of 15,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,125
of 283,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#156
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.