You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The association between social deprivation and the prevalence and severity of dental caries and fluorosis in populations with and without water fluoridation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael G McGrady, Roger P Ellwood, Anne Maguire, Michaela Goodwin, Nicola Boothman, Iain A Pretty |
Abstract |
To determine the association between social deprivation and the prevalence of caries (including caries lesions restricted to enamel) and enamel fluorosis in areas that are served by either fluoridated or non-fluoridated drinking water using clinical scoring, remote blinded, photographic scoring for caries and fluorosis. The study also aimed to explore the use of remote, blinded methodologies to minimize the effect of examiner bias. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
New Zealand | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 22% |
Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 47% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,471,685
of 24,654,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,854
of 16,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,175
of 290,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#43
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.